Thursday, February 17, 2011

Logitech Usb 350 Headset And Ps3

Nepotism, again and again ...


N Epot when you hold us. Not hampered by the illegality of the appointment of Perol to head the group BPCE, nor hindered by the rise stopped in its tracks under popular pressure of Prince John, the Sarkozy cultivates nepotism with a rigor that would increase the Borgias for a holy family. In the recent turmoil on skids on the use of private jets and other conflicts of interest, François Fillon has appointed the son of a certain Jean Tiberi, the Economic and Financial Comptroller General of first class and this, even though the Committee had reviewed his file had a negative opinion about him. But never mind, appointment as Comptroller General Economic and Financial Has it been decided, there will be appointment! It is also not the first time the government openly tramples the rules of appointment.

Justice, justice.
Already in the early days, things did not go for the best. During his first steps at the Chancellery, Rachida Dati was undertaken changing all the attorneys general or at least those who were not in line. Nepotism was so pervasive that during their general meetings, the union of judges laughed through small skits in which they posed the following question:
" What should be qualified to be appointed HC [ hors category]?
Answer A: Having a good record.
Answer B: Have experience.
Answer C: Being friends with Rachida Dati.
Answer D: Obi-Wan Kenobi. "

I'll let you guess the answer.

In continuation of this movement, therefore, two parliamentary questions were raised by the opposition during the traditional question and answer session with the government. Here they are.

"Appointment in the main general economic and financial control

Mr. Chairman. call Mr. John Mallot, for the Socialist group, radical, and various citizen left.

Jean Mallot. Mr. Prime Minister, all means are they good for achieving its purpose? You aspire, they say, you get elected deputy for Paris in 2012. (Shouts on the benches of the UMP.) To prepare the ground, you will stop at nothing. The President of the Republic had wanted to appoint his son to head the public institution for the development of La Défense. (Even movement.)

Lucien Degauchy . That sucks!

Jean Mallot. You just named Decree by the son of former mayor of Paris, Mr. Dominique Tiberi, Economic and Financial Comptroller General of first class. (Laughter on the benches of the CBC group and GDRs).

The Committee of fitness had yet found unanimously that Mr. Tiberi was not fit to perform these functions. You do not take into account. The hearing of the Committee interested in the shows even though "the lack of knowledge by the individual missions of the body and skills required for these functions." It does not invent not! (Applause group CBC).

Did you really think it would go unnoticed? Between unconsciousness and cynicism, we hesitate! (Shouts on the benches of the UMP.)

Dino Cinieri . Marseille!

Jean Mallot. Do I remind you what the candidate Nicolas Sarkozy in 2007? "The perfect democracy is not a democracy where the nominations are decided based on collusion and friendships, but in terms of skills. "

Dino Cinieri . Marseille!

Jean Mallot. I quote: "The fact of the prince is not compatible with the Republic impeccable. "With you, it's not perfect the Republic: the Republic of favoritism!

Bruno Le Roux . They will stop at nothing!

Jean Mallot. In our country, where inequality is increasing and where the feeling of injustice is growing, the way you govern is in question. When you say you want to regulate conflicts of interest, I ask you, Mr. Prime Minister: Who will you believe? (Applause groups SRC and GDRs. - Protests on the benches of the UMP.)

Mr. Chairman. call the minister of the budget, public accounts, Public Service and State Reform, spokesman for the Government.

Mr. Baroin, Minister of Budget, Public Accounts, the Civil Service and State Reform, spokesman for the Government. Sir, I want to tell you: not you, not that, not here, not now! (Loud exclamations on the benches of the CBC group and GDRs).

This body control has existed since 1984. Laurent Fabius, who is set up. I wish you the list of all the familiar power of the time who have held positions of responsibility with a sense of the state, and you have not been convicted. (Applause from the UMP. - Exclamations on the benches of the CBC group.)

Jean Glavany . What an admission!

Mr. Baroin, minister. We come to power in 1986 with the first bill regulating more strictly the rules. You return to the business. I wish you the second list of nominations to general economic and financial control. (Applause from the UMP.)

Revenues in power, we write in 1994 a new transparency law, which establishes the requirement to publish notice of the Committee appointed to consider nominations. You return to business: I wish you the third list of people you've named in the body control. If you really want to wash whiter, I refer to the situation twenty-five years! (Applause from the UMP.)

Patrick Bloche . Answer the question!

Mr. Baroin, minister. A certainly has occurred. The Government is not bound by the opinion of the commission is obliged to publish it, which was made several weeks ago, at the time of the appointment in Cabinet. This review is the Official Journal . There is, I believe it, what to measure changes since 2007, transparency, rigor and general advertising.

Let me say in conclusion that I've not heard of protest the same way when, in a balanced Republican, were appointed people like Mr. Migaud at the head of the ECA (Loud exclamations on the benches of the CBC group and GDRs), Mr. Cahuzac at the head of your finance committee or Mr. Charasse the Constitutional Council. (Applause on the benches of the UMP and NC groups. - Loud protests on the benches of the CBC group.) "



Then another, more general conflict of interest:
" Conflicts Interest

Mr. Chairman. call Mr Olivier Dussopt for the Socialists, radical, and various citizen left.

Olivier Dussopt . Prime Minister, a few weeks ago, some of my colleagues have questioned the issue of conflict of interest and the relationship between power and fortunes of our country, Christian Eckert had referred to a meeting of the "first circle, "the club of the generous donors of the UMP, (Shouts from several benches of the UMP group) meeting at which the President of the Republic had promised the abolition of the ISF. This promise at least he seems to want to keep, and even against the advice of some colleagues in the majority since reiterated yesterday his desire to abolish the wealth tax.

Prime Minister, on other subjects, about the vagaries of your Minister of Foreign Affairs and all that preceded them, we said that we went from the promise of Republic an impeccable guilty complacency vis-à-vis powerful dictatorships. (Protests on the benches of the UMP.)

André Wojciechowski . Oh la la!

Olivier Dussopt . If you confirm today the removal of tax on capital, you will add to the convenience of indecency.

The French suffer and pay for the mistakes of your economic policy: mistakes in managing the crisis, errors and injustices in your choices, with unemployment above 15% of French people under the poverty line, prices which are constantly increasing - the gas, electricity, transport and so on - that reduce social benefits, associations charities overwhelmed, and the report of the Abbé Pierre Foundation, which emphasizes the social crisis in our country.

André Wojciechowski . You have not done better!

Olivier Dussopt . While at the same time, you and your government you seem to revel in a gap between trips inappropriate and indecent dealing, between appointments of convenience to all floors of the Republic and gratuitous provocation. (Shouts on the benches of the UMP.) Rather than respond to expectations of our citizens, the President of the Republic, true to his image as Chairman of the rich, decreed that the priority is to lower the tax on large fortunes!

You send the image of a power deaf to the aspirations of social justice, obstinate in the implementation of an unfair policy. Lowering the tax on large fortunes, is this really your first? Do not tell us that the German Socialists have done: it's Helmut Kohl, Chancellor of the right, which had decided in 1997.

My question is very simple: will you still make a gift tax additional to those households most fortunate in our country? (Applause CBC group and many benches Group GDR).

Mr. Christian Paul. Excellent question!

Mr. Chairman. call the minister of the budget, public accounts, Public Service and State Reform, spokesman for the Government.

Mr. Baroin, budget minister, Public Accounts, the Civil Service and State Reform, spokesman for the Government. Mr. Dussopt, retain all the example of Germany Helmut Kohl and is not relevant and then take the example of Spain: Zapatero is a socialist ...

Mr. Jacques Desallangre . But yes, as much as me!

Mr. Baroin, minister. ... and it has removed the tax on large fortunes. ("Yes!" And applause from many benches of the UMP.) Assume it and acknowledge that this reflection is neither left nor right. This reflection must be shared to achieve the twin objective of this reform: that of social justice that we all share, and that of economic competitiveness, which I want to believe that some of the opposition, who served responsibilities, also continues.

Mr. Philip Plisson . Language wood!

Mr. Baroin, minister. Thank you, thus ensuring, through your issue, promoting the work that we fly under the authority of the Prime Minister, with members of the majority. For several weeks in fact, we are working on an accurate picture of the formation of the heritage of French, comparative law and European tax on the comparative elements of the French tax system and its evolution, which says a lot also on the reality of a country.

This work will continue on a schedule that is mastered, the text will be submitted to the State Council at the end of April, and should be presented to the Cabinet in the first half of May. The bill will then have to be balanced and not to leave the fold. For now, no choice is preferred over another: all scenarios are still under discussion. We say, early March, what are the things we do not retain. Leaving us for another month and a half to refine the text and adjust the balance of legislative work. This will allow us, as President of the Republic had promised, as the Prime Minister has reaffirmed on many occasions to have the month of June, a useful discussion and helpful to our economy for a certain idea of social justice. (Applause from many benches of the UMP.) "

0 comments:

Post a Comment